-
Recent Posts
- OpenCitations Blog moves to Hypotheses.org!
- Two years of achievements within the ‘SCOSS family’ (and it’s not over yet!)
- The OpenCitations Roadmap is now publicly available on Trello
- OpenCitations and EC funding: OpenAIRE Nexus and RISIS2
- Five reasons why 2021 has been a great year for OpenCitations
Recent Comments
Archives
- August 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- January 2014
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- January 2012
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- February 2011
- October 2010
- July 2010
Categories
- Bibliographic references
- Citations as First-Class Data Entities
- Data publication
- Information visualization
- JISC
- Job
- Ontologies
- Open abstracts
- Open academic analytics
- Open academic analytics
- open access
- Open Citation Identifiers
- Open Citations
- Open scholarship
- Open Science
- Semantic Publishing
- Uncategorized
- Web interface design
Meta
Tag Archives: Elsevier
Coverage of open citation data approaches parity with Web of Science and Scopus
Guest blog post by Alberto Martín-Martín, Facultad de Comunicación y Documentación, Universidad de Granada, Spain <albertomartin@ugr.es> In this post, as a contribution to Open Access Week, Alberto Martín-Martín shares his comparative analysis of COCI and other sources of open citation … Continue reading
Posted in Bibliographic references, Open academic analytics, open access, Open Citations, Open Science
Tagged ACS, citation data, citation index, COCI, coverage, Crossref, Dimensions, Elsevier, Google Scholar, I4OC, IEEE, Microsoft Academic, NIH-OCC, open access, open references, OpenCitations, Scopus, Springer Nature, Taylor & Francis, Web of Science, WIley
7 Comments
Crossing a significant threshold: more than one billion citations now available in COCI!
“The competitive benefits of closing access to citation data diminish with each new citation released to the public domain, but the benefits of open data remain. Going forward, citation data is almost completely public domain”. With these words, from the … Continue reading
Posted in Bibliographic references, Citations as First-Class Data Entities, Data publication, open access, Open Citation Identifiers, Open Citations, Semantic Publishing
Tagged citation data, COCI, Crossref, Elsevier, I4OC, Initiative for Open Citations, open access, Open Science, OpenCitations
Leave a comment
Elsevier endorses DORA and opens its journal article reference lists
We congratulate and thank Elsevier, the world’s largest academic publisher, for endorsing the DORA Declaration on Research Assessment (https://sfdora.org/), thereby joining the hundreds of other publishers and scientific organizations which have endorsed DORA over the previous eight years, and also … Continue reading
The first issue of Quantitative Science Studies
The memorable date 20/02/2020 saw the publication by MIT Press of the first issue of Volume One of a new journal, Quantitative Science Studies (QSS), the official open access journal of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI). QSS’s … Continue reading
Posted in Bibliographic references, open access, Open Citations, Open scholarship
Tagged APC, Bibliometrics, citation data, Elsevier, I4OC, Informetrics, ISSI, Journal flip, QSS, Scientometrics
Leave a comment
Openness of non-Elsevier references
For completeness, this post, also based on analyses performed by Daniel Ecer of eLife (d.ecer@elifesciences.org) on data he downloaded from Crossref in September 2017 (Ecer, 2017), complements the two preceding posts, and details the openness of references from scholarly publishers other … Continue reading
Elsevier references dominate those that are not open at Crossref
Yesterday (November 23rd 2017) I was working with Daniel Ecer of eLife (d.ecer@elifesciences.org) to dig some hard facts out of the analyses he undertook on data he downloaded from Crossref in September 2017 (Ecer, 2017). Because of its dominant position in … Continue reading
Milestone for I4OC – open references at Crossref exceed 50%
Yesterday (November 23rd 2017) I was working with Daniel Ecer of eLife (d.ecer@elifesciences.org) to dig some hard facts out of the analyses he undertook on data he downloaded from Crossref in September 2017 (Ecer, 2017). In this, the first of … Continue reading